aps
Regular Member
Posts: 76
|
Post by aps on Mar 12, 2014 13:33:12 GMT 5.5
Dadda-3 (most probably claimed independence after the fall of aulikaras and established rule at Nandol or Nandipur) wrested Ballabhi from Maitrikas. Maitrikas were related to Aulikars, Pratihars (Dadda's lineage) and Chap Gurjars (Chavdas) of Bhinmal. We have a lot of evidence to show that maitrikas were gurjars, so were aulikars (Gurjar narpati pillar inscription at Mandsor). Pratihars were obliviously Gurjars. All this shows that Gurjars were ruling all over India after the fall of Imperial Guptas. More about it at: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Gujarat#Gurjar_ClansDear Ashok, You are again quoting the information taken from secondary sources. 1. Aulikaras might be one of feudatory ruler of Gurjjara ruler Yashodharman. There is no evidence available with me that they were Gurjjars. 2. Dadda was an Emperor and there is no question of getting him independent. The word "Srimant Dadda" was translated by the "barking brigade of Indian dogs" during slavery period of our country to as "Samanta Dadda". 3 Dadda was not of Pratihar gotra but most likely was fron Chawra, Chap sub clan of Gurjjars. Parmar is either a branch of Chawra or Chawra is a sub branch of Gurjjar Parmars. RC Majumdar was one of the barking dog of British India who was instrumental in manipulating and destroying the Gurjjar history. 4. The information which I have been going through is all from the original and primary sources and you will not get it anywhere in secondary sources you have been quoting. 7. Pratihars, Khatanas, Meelus,Chandellas and Karhanas are the descendants of Laxmana. Nagbhatta- I was a great Emperor and he has defeated one Akshohini forces of Mlecchas ( Arabs) in Balkha. That was a big and fierce war where Rashtrkutas joined Arab forces and fought against the Gujjars. Potohar region in present day Pakistan was one of the territory ruled by Gurjjar Pratihars. 8. The fight between Yashodharman and Mihirkul was an internal fight between two Gurjjar groups. There was no Narsimhaupta Baladitya in actual and he was created in virtual by the historians of slavery period writing fake history of India. |
|
aps
Regular Member
Posts: 76
|
Post by aps on Dec 3, 2014 16:16:29 GMT 5.5
AP Singh, Very please to see you on board, now it looks that its a historical site and same for Ashok. Please write your reseach or views about Porus because I have written him as Gujjar in my essays. I know that was not his real name, its not even an Indian word. One thing more was not Tirlochan Pal Kahtan from Jailpal Khatana lineage because I always considered him from Jaipal. Gujjar historical research is now so much ahead than we start ed our work on history.
I am sorry to miss your questions about Porus and Gurjar Samrat Trilichana Pal.
Porus was most likely not a Gujjar. In a Sankrit drama "Mudrarakshash" his original name is written as Parvataka. This was the drama seen by one British scholar and immediately he related the Sandrokottus of Greek records to Chadra Gupta Morya of the Sanskrit drama. Alexender encountered Meelu gotra of Gurjjars in lower Sind in Kushpura ( Modern Multan) and consequently was seriously injured and in fact that was the reason his army could not dare to enter further in India.
Samarat Jaipal was son of Gurjar Samrat Mahipal of Kannauj. Samrat Mahipal is also written as Kshitipal and Akshat Pal of Ferrista is PMP Kshitipal of Kannauj. There title was PMP ( Param Bhattaraka Maharajadhiraja Parmeshwara). Son of Jaipal was Anandpal and son of Anandpal was Brahmpal.
Samrat Trilochana Pal was most probably from the line of Gurjar Samrat Dev Pal. PMP Jaipal was younger brother of PMP Devpal. This information is not found anywhere in direct form but one of the Gaharwal inscription indicates the information that the last Gurjjar Pratihar ruler of Kannauj was from the line of PMP Gurrjar Pratihar Samrat Dev Pal.
Regards. |
|
